If we are truly truth tellers we will speak of beauty with as much alacrity as we speak of injustice. What is the use in tearing down broken-relationship if we ourselves are illiterate in right-relationship?
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Saturday, December 11, 2010
I hope.
Without hope to pull it forward, holy discontent will turn poisonously in on itself morphing slowly to useless angry cynicism. The danger, at the prophetic edge, is in engendering a hope which arises from the thing hoped for—which cannot be sustained. Rather, hope must be engendered through a loving relationship with the one in whom we hope. We must encourage each other to hope for hope makes possible the prophetic words of holy discontent, we surely do not need more hopeless, useless, angry cynicism.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Home
"Art is always transgressive. What I always say is we need to transgress in love. We today have a language to celebrate waywardness, but we do not have a language, a cultural language to bring people back home." Makoto Fujimura
Words that come out of out of Mako Fujimura are almost always inspiring and/or profound. This is a great little video that might centre your day.
Fujimura - 4 Holy Gospels from Crossway on Vimeo.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Knee deep in CSS
I haven't posted in a while, sorry about that. I've been working on the Arts & Language Club website. I'm knee deep in CSS, CMS, HTML, PHP, MySQL and PNGs. My brain hurts and I'm still not done. I'm sure web wizards would finish in hours what's taken me days.
I'm going to flake out and post another video, but it's kind of a special one. (Thanks Barry for passing it on.) You may have heard that Benoit Mandelbrot, the mathematician who discovered/invented/studied "regular roughness" or "fractals, died last week at the age of 85. Now I'm not a mathematician by any stretch of the imagination—I don't think I could pass grade 11 math right now if my life depended on it—but Mandelbrot is still special to me. Way back in *cough, cough* 1987 I read a book called "Chaos; Making A New Science," by James Gleick. It was all about chaos theory and Mandelbrot is pivotal in world of chaos theory.
The book was astonishing to me. This notion of astounding complexity coming from stark simplicity was exciting and invigorating. I loved the book, I loved the excitement of inquiry and learning that welled up in me, which was no small thing. About the only thing my high school diploma had left me with was a grey and whithered imagination, it had bled the joy of learning from me. This book came at a time when, and perhaps was the first step toward, regaining the joy of learning. It was a hugely important transition in my life. A year later I started a Fine Arts Degree and the rest, as they say, is history.
The Mandelbrot set is the lasting iconic image of that book, that time, that awakening. Thank you Dr. Mandelbrot for your work.
So here's the video, it's Dr. Mandelbrot giving a TED talk in February of this year. Enjoy:
Wednesday, October 06, 2010
Are you an artist? Do you need a hug?
Here you go, a virtual hug from Dr. Cornel West. Lay down your burden for a moment and listen to these beautiful words. Just 6 minutes and then you can get back to work, restorative powers guaranteed.
Saturday, October 02, 2010
:) and :(
Sent from my iPhone
Friday, October 01, 2010
Feeling down? Step into heaven for a bit...
Ben was watching this and I asked, "Where is this?" and he said, "Heaven?" Here it is, Baptists burning it up, Wendell Lowe on the organ:
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Why?
Thursday, September 09, 2010
This might get loud.
I recently realized how important it is to learn a language in context, in a living breathing world.
I thought of all of this when I heard a preacher the other day. (I saw it online, so it could be virtually anyone in case you're getting nervous.) I was going to go into particulars, but I think that just ends up sounding whiny and disingenuous. Besides, it isn't about a collection of facts to prove a point.
Here's the thing, I often feel like a jittery little forest animal that senses danger, like a forest fire or an earth quake. I think getting jittery over potential danger is one of the roles of the poetic voice within the church. [and in our world at large, but that's another discussion.] It isn't necessarily a condemning voice and it certainly isn't a voice of delineated facts. It's a voice that offers, provisionally and in humility, what it sees and senses for the sake of all the other forest animals. It's a voice that says, "I'm starting to notice something, I'm not even sure what it is or if I can explain it but I can't dismiss it, is it something we should be paying attention to?" Is this something we should be paying attention to: I couldn't help but think this preacher had been safely employed in his separate-from--real-life context for a very long time. His worth and identity are wrapped up in his determining and cleverly communicating, in this safe separate-from-the-real-world context, his particular version of flat words on a page which, after time, could lead to mild delusion. I found myself saying, "I don't think that word means what he thinks it means." I couldn't help but wonder, is well communicated smug pop psychology on a Sunday morning the best we can hope for? Is "love" primarily talking about love and giving examples of what love might look like in the real world? When is "love" primarily just being love in the real world? If we can gather to talk about it, should we be gathering to be it?Is "joy" primarily singing songs in our own buildings once a week where it's controllable and safe? When is "joy" just being joyful in the real world where we might be vulnerable? If we do think joy is primarily being joyful in the real world, do our physical and organizational structures, the way we do things, bear evidence of that? [I tend to think our structures say talking about things is the most important thing, which can tacitly uphold the idea that things that can be effectively talked about are the most important things.]
When is "peace" simply peace in the real world and not an interesting but naive notion we talk about? Is gathering together to talk about peace the best we can hope for? Or should we be gathering together to make peace? What would that look like? Maybe we should be making peace and then gathering together to talk about our making peace. But that would require everyone talking, and about actual things that actualy happened; not one person talking about what should happen while assuming it likely won't.
These are things this jittery little forest creature wonders about.
Friday, September 03, 2010
Untitled
Really, really enjoying Diana Butler Bass's book "A People's HIstory of Christianity."
Have a look at TWOTP films with Diana Butler Bass. This one pairs nicely with the quote below.
The story of Christianity most familiar to us is the "Big-C" version; Christ, Constantine, Christendom, Calvin and Christian America, which, she adds, is a militant Christianity.
"...it is a theological disposition that interprets Christianity as an us-against-them morality tale of a suffering church that is vindicated by God through its global victory over other worldviews, religions, or political systems."
This version of Christianity produces a sort of spiritual amnesia. There is so much more to the story of Christianity that isn't part of the "Big-C" version. The title of her book is a reference to "A People's History of the United States" by Howard Zinn. By "a people's history" he meant a history which intentionally followed lesser known figures, smaller untold stories that needed telling. Bass adopts this same trajectory, telling a "people's history" of Christianity, lesser know stories (at least lesser known to those most familiar with "Big-C" Christianity) that need telling in an attempt to cure spiritual amnesia.
Here's a good quote within a quote:
"...the desert fathers and mothers believed that prayer was a disposition of wholeness, so that 'prayer and our life must be all of a piece.' They approached prayer, as early church scholar Roberta Bondi notes, as a practical twofold process: first, of 'thinking and reflecting,' or 'pondering' what it means to love others; and second, as the "development and practice of loving ways of being."
For a big chunk of my life I felt a combination of guilt and shame at not being very good at sitting-in-a-quiet-place-eyes-closed-praying. Had I known about the desert fathers and mothers, I might have realized the pondering that comes so naturally to me was indeed one half of the twofold process of praying. Like most artists, I think the pondering part comes naturally. Developing and practicing loving ways of being, now that might not come quite as naturally, but at least I have a hope of working towards it when I don't write myself off as a daydreaming ne'er-do-well.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Weaving
<p>Weaving silk using a mitochondrial sequence from Gabriel Harp on Vimeo.</p>
This video is from an article I found called "Weaving Haplotypes" It's pretty cool if you're willing to wade through it. The short version is someone is weaving silk using DNA sequencing to determine the colour pattern.
That got me thinking about this:
As we rest collectively in what it means to be children of God, we understand more fully what we are to do collectively as children of God; as we rest individually in what it means to be a child of God, we understand more fully what we are to do individually as children of God.
Conversely and with equal importance: as we do collectively what it is we have come to understand children of God do, we understand more fully what it means to be collectively children of God; as we do individually what it is we have come to understand a child of God does, we understand more fully what it means to be individually a child of God. Resting in identity and doing calling are intimately entwined in both communities and individuals. These four strands, when woven by the Spirit, create a tapestry of stories stronger than steel and more beautiful than the best mere human hands could offer.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Sky blue sky is sky blue.
Ben has a job for the summer, so every Tuesday and Thursday I drive him over to North Vancouver. I'm going to miss those drives. Every time we head out Ben plugs in his iPod and starts Sky Blue Sky, so we have a fairly consistent sound track for our drives to North Van. Somewhere close to the Lions Gate Bridge is when we get to "Please Be Patient With Me," one of my all time favorite songs. Can there be anything better than a beautiful morning drive with your son? The sun is up, the windows are down, we're enjoying one of the most beautiful views in the world and we're listening to Wilco. Sacred times.
Our trips are usually pretty quiet. We're guys. Plus we're listening to Wilco. I sometimes wonder how I'm doing; you know, with the whole father thing. Maybe I should talk more, say more stuff, try to be wise and whatnot. I sometimes wonder, of all the conversations, phone calls, iChats, discussions, arguments, sermons, lectures, laughter and tears Ben overhears—what sticks? What does he notice? What does he think of all the blah blah blah going on around him? As I say, we're often pretty quiet, so sometimes I'm not sure, that's why I'm wondering if I should talk more, find out what's going on. Well, yesterday he showed me a poem he wrote. I guess the blah blah blah-ing can't be all bad. Here it is: [he gave me permission to post this]
To The Man At The Door
Am I not welcome?
How can this be?
I think you've got things wrong
because I'm a son
no less than you or the next man
And no greater than the
one on the street
Tell me now
what would Jesus do
If you were him
and I was you?
You know, I get it now
a mosaic doesn't fit in
your square picture frame
if it did, not all of the pieces
would be welcome
In your square slot
there's no room to dance
or move at all
So tell me door man
is the shape of my tile
not suited to your slot?
If not, don't worry
I know a place down the road
they will have a spot for me
in their mosaic
and they won't think twice
before bringing me in
Sunday, August 08, 2010
Thursday, August 05, 2010
I think I have diorama.
p.s. I'm particularly fond of the moose.
Tuesday, August 03, 2010
Oh, for the grace of my elders.
Monday, August 02, 2010
When I was your age...
The second picture is one of those famous prairie grain elevators. Southey is really small, but they have a grain elevator and a hockey rink.
The last picture is the house my Mom grew up in. Nine kids! The attic space served as the second floor and the bedroom space for all the kids, 4 boys on one side and 5 girls on the other. Different times my friends.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Theology through flamenco
My friend Constance Chan danced her Master's thesis at Regent recently, "Nails in the Soles of My Shoes." This gives me hope for the church.
Friday, July 23, 2010
More than words
<!-- LIFE GALLERY 45701 --><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.life.com/embed/index/js"></script><script type="text/javascript">LIFEembedDrawGallery(45701);</script>
I remember this image and the Benetton ad. But as the commentary suggests, the rest of the photos got lost in the controversy. The whole photo essay is worth getting through. (Have some tissues handy)
I think part of the reason these images are so powerful is Bill Kirby's everyman-ness. Just by looking at him I can guess how he grew up, what he valued, his manner of speech. And then I can imagine how all of that is either burned away or caught up in the flame of human caring, a father's love for his son.Slide 14. If that isn't an image of simple frail humanity being the hands and feet of Jesus I don't know what is. Two men who shouldn't even know each other, let alone love each other. What can it be other than love? Father and adopted son.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Narthex Warz
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
That's not a narthex...
...this is a narthex. Yes, I used the word narthex because that's the term they use here at the United Methodist Church of the Ressurection where the National Worship Leaders Conference is being held. So what does this space have to do with gothic cathedrals, cruciform basilicas and the historical notion of narthex? And, discuss.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Yep, that's a sunrise
Sent from my iPhone
Friday, July 16, 2010
Immeasurably More
Sent from my iPhone
Sunday, July 04, 2010
Pan-Asian Awesomeness
Love My New Skillet
Thursday, July 01, 2010
Canada Unhinged
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Unless
"In a time of drastic change it is the learners who inherit the future. The learned usually find themselves equipped to live in a world that no longer exists."
~ Eric Hoffer, philosopher and author (1902-1983)
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Belated Father's Day
Father's Day was good to me, as seen above.
The belated part relates to posting the picture just today. I had some iOS4 issues and I couldn't attach the picture to an email, nor could I get it off my phone. Urgh. And, to top it off my favorite app wasn't working. All resolved now though, so let the hip picture taking resume. PS The Laphroaig is VERY good.Monday, June 21, 2010
Art creates space to ponder
[[posterous-content:pid___0]]
"If we think at all about the church, it is historically and intrinsically an artistic operation. It always struck me in the little rural church where I grew up that no matter how flat and unimaginative and prosaic the life of the village was, we had that organ music on Sunday morning. And what the organ music did was to create space for us to ponder the stuff that didn't fit the formulae. And, by and large, the language of the church and the language of liturgy is essentially artistic language. We flattened it. So the work, it seems to me, first of all, is to help people see what has been entrusted to us is artistic from the bottom up. If people are caught in dogmatism or in moralism they tend not to notice how incredibly artistic it all is." ~Walter Brueggemann
Heard these words again this morning. It's a little self serving, but the quote comes from a TWOTP interview we did with Walter last year. You can find the video on our site for context.
I had to put this up because I've been speaking lately about creative expression being central to God's people being God's people. After a while one begins to doubt one's own words. Is it really? Maybe I have it all wrong. Maybe I'm way off base. And then I hear the words above and I realize being an advocate for artists and the arts means being an advocate for that which is entrusted to us. Suddenly being an advocate for the arts seems mildly terrifying, but it's a holy terror.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Black and White
Good bye Albuquerque
Washroom? You mean "restroom?"
One teaching gig down, one to go
The Work Of The People was invited to teach a seminar here at NWLC. So this morning I presented "Towards a Theology of Visual Media." Good to talk about stuff we've been chewing on for so long.
Also heard a great story from one of the attendees about the Kingdom breaking through. Alan teaches at a middle school. He sent one of his students out to take sport images and she got bored and brought back all kinds of beautiful images of the landscape around her. She ended up making an amazing video that catalyzed her classmates to embark on a spontaneous garbage clean up in their neighbourhood. She didn't set out to change her world, she was just telling her story. You can find her story and the video here. Visual media in the hands of kids is an awesome thing.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Up in the air
Here I am in the placeless place, the non-culture of the airport, a manufactured landscape of banality. Okay, it's early, I got up at 4:30. Maybe I won't be quite so bleak once the Americano kicks in.
I'm on my way to Albuquerque, of all places. I'm speaking at the south west region National Worship Leader conference presenting a seminar called "Toward a theology of visual media." Come look me up if you're going to be there.Thinking of my Aboriginal friends
Thinking of my Aboriginal friends, Patrick, Marvin and of course my new friends Mary, Ruth and Little Mouse. The following links are all in relation to the Forgiveness Summit in Ottawa this past week leading up to National Aboriginal Day on June 21
The Prime Minister gave a formal apology to former students of the federally financed native residential schools. Here's the full text of the Prime Minister's speech:
(links at the bottom of the page to a formal apology from the Anglican Church, Presbyterian Church, United Church and the RCMP.)And a response from the Aboriginal people of Canada.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Yesterday's Regent visit up on Vimeo
Ryan came all the way into Vancouver to shoot this little adventure and has it cut together and up on Vimeo already. Thanks editing superstar dude!
Thanks again to Robert and Cherith Nordling of Calvin College for inviting me into their "Arts and Worship" class being taught at Regent over the next 2 weeks. Also, thanks to the class members in attendance for your attention and energy and for putting up with a giant camera in your classroom. I left energized, encouraged and blessed.
Like most human beings, I despise watching myself on video. I am therefore somewhat loath to post this. However, I believe in the importance of the broader discussion regarding creative expression happening in the church today, of which this humble offering is a small part. So I'll go with the needs of the broader discussion.
<p>Steve Frost on Art & Worship from Transposition Films on Vimeo.</p>
Wednesday, June 09, 2010
Off to Regent
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Cornucopia Saturday
FEAST ONE: Spent the morning listening to Mike Frost [no relation] at an event sponsored by Parish Collective and Forge Canada. Good food for the soul talking about a theology of place. My favorite metaphor: a community of people who are followers of Jesus are a movie trailer for the Kingdom. We create places of love and justice as a foretaste of the kingdom. Based on the movie trailers we create, would people want to go see the movie? Favorite snippet: Maybe the church confuses friendliness for friends.
FEAST TWO: This was an actual feast, in Surrey, of all places. Went to a great brew pub after the day's events. This is the only picture I have, (That's Dwight Freisen and Cam Roxburgh) I was kind of in the moment enjoying my stout and not documenting. Had a good chat with Mark Votava, Mike Frost, Tim Soerens and his wife Maria-Jose. There were 13 of us in all, so pretty spread out. You know how it is Paul. Next time brother, we will talk Ellul.
FEAST THREE: On my way in to Mosaic I discovered something I hadn't noticed before. Pea plants growing out of the tiny little crack between the sidewalk and the building. Rowan, the guy with the flower in his teeth, planted them. There's a beautiful little white flower at the top of one of the stalks, and if you look closely you can see lots of perfect green pea pods. Is this not the greatest thing ever? Is this not a picture of the Kingdom? Beauty literally breaks through. Love wins! [btw Rowan is flashing the West Van sign for those that might be wondering.]
FEAST FOUR: Rev. Mary Fontaine of Hummingbird Ministries was our guest at Mosaic. She and two friends sang songs and conducted a sharing circle with us. We all felt such a connection to these sisters and their heart for reconcilliation and peace.
Ruth, the woman closest to the camera in the picture above, is from the local Musqeam band. For thousands of years, the Musqeam people lived and flourished on the land that is now the city of Vancouver. To open our evening Ruth sang a song of welcome on behalf of the Musqeam people, welcoming us to this land and inviting us into their circle of friendship. This welcome song had a profound and equally unexpected impact on me. I am the very picture of dominant hegemony; white, middle class, male. Despite being demographically at the centre of our culture's attention, I am affected by a rootlessness that many urban dwellers experience. I have no tangible connection to my mish-mash of national ties a couple of generations back. There is much to love in the shiny garden of Vancouver, but for many of us our roots aren't deep. These women from the margins—women at the very edge of our culture's attention who have experienced all kinds of ugly and systemic discrimination—have rediscovered a deep connection to the narrative of this place. And what is their response to discovering their rootedness, their narrative, their community, their place? They invite me into that narrative with them. Tears well up thinking about it now. For this somewhat rootless soul it was such a warm embrace. A little piece of me felt "I've been welcomed, I really belong here now." and that was way more important than I ever would have thought it was.
Here's some liturgy for you all. I recorded it on my iPhone, so the sound quality isn't great, but the quality of spirit is awesome:
Rowan sang the Woman Warrior song to our sisters, thanking them for coming and visiting us.
Our sisters sang Amazing Grace in Cree for us and then we all joined in in English. Mary talked about how special it was to sing this song in her native language of Cree. Not too long ago her language was forbidden, outlawed. What an amazing gift that this language, this way of seeing the world, this way of understanding the Creator, the Father, Son and Spirit hasn't been lost. What a testament to courage that faithful ones have persevered and retained this piece of our common humanity.
Speaking @ Regent
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Self-Other-Us and Spiritual Karate
SPEAKING OF KARATE
I walked by a dojo the other day and it reminded me of Mark Scandrette's idea of a Jesus Dojo. In Japanese "dojo" means "the place where you learn the way." So a Jesus dojo is a place where you learn the way of Jesus. Pretty cool image for a church. For me it's much more compelling than the current lecture hall image which predominates North America.
Dwight used the picture of marriage to talk about a notion of "self," "other" and "us." He talked about it in the context of his marriage. However, for the sake of linguistic clarity I'll use the example of my marriage, but it could be any marriage. It's less about marriage per se and more about a graspable example of human interaction.In the context of my marriage there is "Steve" as definable and distinct from my wife Lindi. There is "Lindi" as definable and distinct from Steve. But our friends can point to an "Us" that is neither Steve nor Lindi. The "Us" emerges from the relational dynamic between Steve and Lindi and is distinct from either "Steve" or "Lindi." This self-other-us picture of marriage gives marriage a decidedly trinitarian aspect, but you can talk to Dwight about that, it's his bailiwick.For my part, I was thinking about this self-other-us dynamic and put it together with Ellul and Wink.In the context of my marriage there isn't one version of "Us," there are two. A generative "Us" that arises out of the good of our marriage and a degenerative "Us" that arises out of the brokeness of our marriage. The impact of "Us" in the world depends on which version is in control.Here's another important point, the degenerative "Us" is the generative "Us" gone awry, so the degenerative "Us" is redeemable. Just as I, a distinct person have gone awry and am redeemable, the relational "Us" that arises between two individuals is also redeemable.The generative and degenerative "Us" are in constant tension. The generative can become degenerative and the degenerative can become generative. My wife and I have to apply constant vigilance to the embodied practises of our relationship. We have to constantly inspect the systems and structures—the accrued reality of embodied practices—our marriage operates within in order to insure our embodied practises give rise to a generative "Us" rather than a degenerative "Us."In other words, the more my wife and I live out of our brokeness, our selfishness, self-centredness, unloving-ness, the more our marriage is defined by a broken "Us." However, the more my wife and I live out of our goodness, faith, hope and love, the more our marriage is defined by a good "Us." [I use the rich Hebraic notion of "good" here, meaning internal and external right-relationship]But how do we move toward Good Us and away from Broken Us? There are two ways: first, I can allow God's redemptive power to restore "self." The best thing I can do to move toward a Good Us is to let God restore "me." Second, I can actively fight for a Good Us. Once I rightly understand my enemy as Broken Us I'm freed from focusing my fight against flesh and blood, namely my wife, and I can rightly focus my fight against Broken Us.SYSTEMIC KARATE
How do I fight against a degenerative "Us?" Systems give rise to embodied practises and embodied practises give rise to "Us." Systems arising out of love, hope and faithfulness give rise to loving, hopeful and faithful embodied practises, which in turn give rise to a Good Us; conversely systems arising out of non-love, non-hope and unfaithfulness give rise to un-loving, unhopeful, unfaithful practises which in turn give rise to Broken Us.So, by creating and nurturing systems which arise out of love, hope and faithfulness I fight for Good Us; conversely, by disrupting and subverting systems which arise out of non-love, non-hope and unfaithfulness I fight against Broken Us.For me, this notion of the unseen Broken Us of human systems opens up new understanding to verses like Ephesians 6:12. "Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms." For me it makes the whole thing less pseudo-voodoo and more tangibly about my relationship with the Father, Son and Spirit and my living out of that relationship. It doesn't make it less mysterious and out of my control, I'm still as dependant on God, but this understanding somehow makes the supernatural natural. The way things work are the way things work.COMPLEX US
So here's the important thing for the church, this idea of "Us" exists in the outworking of all human systems; a marriage, a neighbourhood, a clan, a company, an organization, a city, a country, or a local body of believers.The same "self," "other," "us" dynamic we've been looking at is present in these far more complex systems. These complex systems give rise to either Broken Us or Good Us. Further, in these complex systems the same two strategies remain in moving away from Broken Us and toward Good Us. First and foremost I can allow God to change "Me." Second, I can disrupt and subvert systems which uphold unloving, unhopeful, unfaithful practices.CHURCH US
What if our church systems—the accrued reality of our embodied practises—contribute more toward Broken Us than toward Good Us? What if what we do in the name of Good Us actually manifests more of a Broken Us?Our world is one of institutions ruled by hyper-rationalism, numbers dominate. The hubris of self sure categorizing, measuring and analyzing give us the illusion of control. The comfortable lives of the affluent are marked by fragmentation, isolation and loneliness. The desperate lives of the poor are marked by a lack of dignity, lack of hope and lack of care. The Broken Us that arises from our culture is an Us of anonymous consuming deluded by a hyper-rational illusion of control.I am, admitedly, only describing the Broken Us of our culture. For sure there is a Good Us that arises from our culture, and for sure the Broken Us and the Good Us are in constant tension as to which defines Us. But I'd like to focus on the nature of the Broken Us of our culture for a moment, because I'd like to point out something about the way we do church.EMPTY HANDS
If the way we do church requires categorizing, measuring and analyzing to precede ancient church disciplines [prayer, meditation, fasting, study, generosity, celebration and worship] rather than those ancient disciplines preceding our categorizing, measuring and analyzing; then aren't we giving rise to a Broken Us that is the mirror image of the Broken Us of our culture at large? How can the Broken Us of a local body of believers tear down the strongholds of the Broken Us of the broader culture when the Broken Us of the church is the bastard child of the Broken Us of the broader culture? How can anonymous consumerism burdened with an illusion of control tear down the strongholds of anonymous consumerism burdened with an illusion of control? Even though a hyper-rational numbers dominated way of doing church does give rise to a Good Us, I guess I have to ask, is it worth it? Does that way of doing church leave Good Us or Broken Us in control? Does the way we do church hobble us when it comes to fighting the Broken Us of our culture?Maybe we can't engage in sprititual karate because we have too many flesh and blood weapons in our hands. Maybe we need to put down some things and come at it empty handed. With empty hands we, out of sheer necessity, pick up truth, righteousness, readiness, faith, salvation and the sword of the Spirit which is the word of God. We don't take up these things to attack people, we take up these things to attack un-loving, un-hopeful and unfaithful practises; un-loving, un-hopeful and unfaithful systems; we take up these things to attack Broken Us.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Manufactured Landscapes
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Tanya's drawing
Tanya and Lindsay
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Monday, May 17, 2010
Seattle twice in as many weeks
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
South of the 49th
Headed south to Seattle to do some filming with Dwight Friesen. Met up at Mars Hill Graduate School (no affiliation with Mars Hill Church BTW). Dwight recently published a book "Thy Kingdom Connected." It fuses two of my favorite topics God's kingdom an network theory.
Four Canucks on this road trip. Fantastic time had by all, topped off with pizza, beer and cigars on Dwight's back deck.
Also got introduced to Tim Soerens and Paul Sparks who created Parish Collective "rooted in neighborhood and linked across cities." Great guys doing great work, look forward to getting together again when they're up in Vancouver with Mike Frost June 5. We did some filming Tim and Paul too. Ryan is trying to cut something together, busy lad, and we'll post it on Vimeo so you can hear what Parish Collective is all about.
Sunday, May 09, 2010
Matt's drawing
Sent from my iPhone
Mosaic video
Ryan of Transposition Films shot and edited a little video for us explaining Mosaic. (Like you can ever explain Mosaic.)
It's up on Vimeo and I'll try my first attempt at embedding a Vimeo link. Here goes:
Ironman 2: The Updatening
Well, we got home somewhere around 3am, but it was one of those things we can say we did together. Consensus seems to be it was a good father move.
THE REVIEW:
It was what it was suppose to be. Seems they managed to pull off a sequel at least equal to the original. It manages to enhance rather than damages the franchise. I'm sure there will be caterwauling about it being a lead in to yet more of the same, but isn't that the point? Part of the fun is knowing there's more to come. Also, no, I've never read an Ironman comic book. Yes, I got that some other characters from that series were introduced in this movie. It's not that complicated.
This offing didn't fall into the "more bigger explosions" trap which so often befalls sequels and ends up destroying any pacing or coherence. If there was more of anything there was more of the quick and sharp banter which gave it a smart feeling without being too smart. (At least, not too smart for the summer action 'splosion crowd.) The story was slightly better than a well written episode for a TV series, which is all you want from a summer action blockbuster.
Great casting, great performances from everyone. They all seemed to actually be having fun with their roles. I am happy to report Scarlett Johansson continues to impress. Her wanton marshal-arts-tress didn't have that "Hey I'm 20, but look at the big boy stuff I'm doing" feel that a lot of those wanton marshal-arts-tress parts seem to have. She was very convincing in an Uma killing Bill kind of way. She commands the screen as not many can. It's nice to see someone you hope is as good as you think they are actually be as good as you hope they are. (Lost In Translation, still one of my favorites.)

































